Prevalence of MCS in United States

A national population study of the prevalence of multiple chemical sensitivity.

2004 SM Caress and AC Steinemann
State University of West Georgia, Carrollton, Georgia 30118, USA. scaress@westga.edu

Abstract

The authors conducted a telephone survey of 1054 randomly selected individuals within the continental United States to determine the prevalence of chemical hypersensitivity and the medical diagnosis of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) in the American population. The etiology and symptomatology of MCS also were investigated.

Results produced a 95% confidence level and a +/-3% margin of error. The authors found that 11.2% of Americans reported an unusual hypersensitivity to common chemical products such as perfume, fresh paint, pesticides, and other petrochemical-based substances, and 2.5% reported they had been medically diagnosed with MCS.

Additionally, 31.1% of those sampled reported adverse reactions to fragranced products, and 17.6% experienced breathing difficulties and other health problems when exposed to air fresheners. Although chemical hypersensitivity was more common in women, it affected individuals in all demographic groups studied.

ARTICLE RESOURCE:

Caress SM, Steinemann AC. State University of West Georgia (2004). A national population study of the prevalence of multiple chemical sensitivityArch Environ Health. 2004 Jun;59(6):300-5. PubMed.gov. PMID: 16238164 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE].

[Top of Page]

   [Top of Page]


Copyright 1997-2011, Invisible Disabilities Association - A 501(c)(3) Non-Profit Organization.
All rights reserved. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use
Disclaimer: Neither Cleaner Indoor Air (CIA), the Invisible Disabilities Association (IDA), nor any parties affiliated with CIA or IDA endorse, promote or necessarily agree with any or all information contained within this website, pages, articles, comments, links, etc. Posted links and information does not constitute endorsement of any website, organization, business, product or service. Neither IDA nor any of our affiliates, board members, volunteers etc. can be held responsible for any information, comments or opinions expressed within this site or any linked sites. Data contained in this web site should not be construed as legal, medical or scientific advice. Use your own discretion and seek legal, medical or scientific advice from a professional before taking action or changes.